Monday, May 27, 2013

Suzuki Savage review

About a year ago, I bought a low miles 1987 Suzuki Savage for my wife.  The  Savage (also known as the Boulevard S40) is an underrated and misunderstood bike.   It is a light and simple single cylinder 650cc cruiser-style bike, with belt drive and a 4 speed transmission.   Its target market sees that it is a 650, and assumes it is too big and powerful.  People considering  650cc bikes find the Savage underpowered.

Ignore the displacement of the engine--rather than comparing to other 650cc bikes, compare it to bikes with similar seat height, weight and horsepower.  (I've never understood focusing on displacement rather than power and weight)  This puts it in the upper end of the 250 class of bikes--low seat height, similar weight, a bit more horsepower and lots more torque.

Horsepower is responsible for top speed, and also for acceleration when driven hard, and is likely to get inexperienced riders in trouble..  Torque is responsible for off the line and everyday performance when you aren't thrashing the bike.  More torque makes starting and shifting easier--if you let the clutch out too fast, it may chug and complain, but it isn't likely to stall.

The early Savage models had a 4 speed transmission, while later models are 5 speed.   The 5th gear  was added for marketing purposes--basically top gear was raised a tiny amount and another gear slipped in between 3rd and top.  This requires an extra shift, but with the torque curve of this engine there's no advantage from the extra gear.

I'm not a fan of cruiser styling in general, but that's taste rather than a valid criticism.   It does allow forward controls, which let the seat height be low enough for almost any adult while leaving enough room for a 6 foot rider.  (The Savage is a bit cramped for me but rideable.  The Honda Rebel is just plain too small)   The tank-mounted gauges are a significant sacrifice in usability to gain an uncluttered handlebar area--the gauges are well out of the rider's normal line of sight requiring a deliberate look down instead of being visible with a quick glance, especially with a full face helmet.    This is especially problematic for the turn signals--when I ride with my wife, I'm constantly reminding her on the intercom to turn the signal off.  (I'm going to add a beeper, or a light she can see)   Another flaw is the lack of either a fuel gauge or trip odometer--every bike should have at least one.   No tachometer, but on this bike not really needed.


9 comments:

  1. Yo Mr Sevesteen, I think I figured out where the dreaded malware was coming from... please inform me if you get it again.

    Tell Mrs Sevesteen I said hello and keep on ridin.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Daisy, I've put you back in my reader, we'll see what happens next time you post something reply-worthy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8:57 PM

    As someone who just bought a 2006 Boulevard S40 (same as the Savage, basically), I'd like to add that there is a completely different feel between a 250 twin and a 650 single. The 650 is a Thumper, and it's old school. People were riding big singles back in the 1950s and 1960s. There's no buzz-buzz-buzz, whine-whine-whine with a big Thumper. It's like a drum when you're riding it, or a heartbeat. It has its own unique charm that you just cannot get from a multi-cylinder engine of any displacement. It's the perfect first bike, because it is forgiving of mistakes, but at the same time powerful enough for the highway. And when something needs service, it's the simplest bike there is. It's a bit like an old 1960s pre-catalytic converter, pre-electronic ignition car. Also, there are so many of these bikes around, parts are easy to get and cheap.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3:29 AM

    i bght a2002 savage abt 2 mnths back hve dne nearly a 1000 miles
    having a ball ....
    shame they didnt continue up to date would buy a new model no problem

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm curious what you mean by "up to date" given the retro and beginner nature of the bike? Fuel injection might be nice, but adds a good bit to the cost without a whole lot of benefit for this particular use. Power is enough for the market, maintenance isn't much on single carb bikes.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous1:58 PM

    I'm a new rider and bought a 2013 about 6 months ago. The 250's were too wimpy and 750's and up too big. This big hits the spot; light and low to the ground; yet big enough to ride around on for years to come.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous9:39 AM

    I bought a 2001 Savage new. My wife and I rode it around two up for the whole summer. We then traded it for the Yamaha vstar Silverado. There was never a time that we didn't enjoy the Savage. It was light, fun, enjoyable. If it wasn't for me thinking if the seat for my wife, we would still have it today. I wish Suzuki would make it retro enough to put a worth while seat for two on it. We would go back and buy another one for the simplicity and fun of riding it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Lori Brown1:35 PM

    I have a Yamaha 650 V star and as a small figured woman it is way to much bike for me so my husband has picked out a 2012 Suzuki Boulevard 650, As a woman's point of view, wow what a difference!!! I felt like I am controlling the bike and not the other way around. And I was able to put my feet flat on the ground. It seems like a good bike to cruise the county roads with my husband. I am trying to get information on the bike itself before purchasing it. Any suggestions? I was able to test drive it this weekend and really loved the way it handled. I have been only riding about 2 years and a seasonally rider at that. I really don't want to spend a whole lot of money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not sure exactly what you are looking for. I don't know of any trouble spots to beware of on the Savages (I'm no expert) , and the things I'd be concerned with (mostly old, dry tires) wouldn't apply to a bike that new. There are a couple of forums dedicated to the Savage.

      If you do go older, check date codes on tires, and budget replacements on tires more than about 5 years old. Low miles doesn't stop tires from getting hard and losing traction, and I've had several old bikes where even mild riding showed the old tires were unsafe.

      Delete