Friday, May 23, 2008
My latest silly purchase: A 1970 Timex display cabinet. This year is pretty well centered in the era of watches I like best. Most watches were still fully mechanical. Go back 10 years, and watches were tiny by todays' standards. Forward 10 years, and they are mostly quartz--Superior timekeepers, but it isn't nearly as interesting when even a basic department store watch is equal (or superior) in performance to an expensive luxury brand.
Monday, May 12, 2008
Hell in a Handbasket linked to a recent post, saying that "although his passion are American made watches which use mechanical movement." Close, but not quite--There's really no such thing as an affordable American-made watch in the era I like best. A brief history of American-market Watches: Until about 1850, England and Switzerland dominated watchmaking. English watches were more practical, Swiss fancier. Waltham in Massachusetts was the first to assembly-line watches, drastically reducing the price of a decent watch--instead of a single skilled watchmaker taking weeks or months to make a watch, a factory would produce higher-quality watches with 3-4 days labor. The downside was that there were few options on factory watches--In order to get these economies, they had to make thousands near-identical. Elgin in Illinois followed a few years later, and together they dominated the vast middle ground of watches for decades. Swiss watches were inferior, and there was a significant problem with "Swiss Fakes"--Swiss watches disguised as American, with either sound-alike brands or actual counterfeits. The predecessor to Timex started as the Waterbury clock company, who later absorbed Ingersoll, and operated for a while as US Time. They specialized in very inexpensive watches--"The watch that made the dollar famous" was one slogan. A far cry from the jeweled watches of Waltham and Elgin, they were affordable and sturdy, but not long-lasting. It is unclear who made the first real wristwatch. There were ladies versions by Patek-Phillipe in the late 1800s. Cartier claims the first men's wristwatch in 1902, and they became more and more popular during and after WWI, as their practicality became evident. The Swiss were more willing to change, and wristwatches helped them regain prominence. During WWII, the US companies could not produce watches for civilians, and after took some time to re-tool from wartime manufacturing back to watches. This also helped the Swiss. American companies kept with their original tradition--Simple but well-made watches, with few features. The Swiss added calenders and automatic winding. American companies relied more and more on Swiss parts, and by the early 60's, most of the American brands had new, foreign owners. (Currently, MZ Berger owns the Waltham, Elgin and Gruen in the US. Hamilton is owned by Swatch. Bulova has recently been bought by Citizen. A Swiss descendant of the original Waltham remains, selling primarily in Japan) In the 1957, Hamilton in the US sold the first electric watch, soon followed by several other companies. This used a small (for the time) battery that powered the watch for about a year. These watches had teething problems--They were purely electric, retaining the balance wheel and most of the gears of a traditional watch, but substituting electrical contacts and electromagnets for the mainspring. The contacts would arc slightly, several times per second eventually damaging them. These watches had very little to recommend them over the proven automatic wind watches. In 1960, Bulova came out with the Accutron, arguably the biggest leap in watchmaking since the mid 1800's. An electronically-controlled tuning fork drove the watch, allowing a mid-priced watch to have accuracy not possible in a wristwatch up to that point. Instead of the tic-tock of a standard watch, Accutrons have a low-pitched hum, and the second hand gliding smoothly with no starting or stopping. Japanese watches were nearly unheard of in the US until the late 60's, when they were brought home by returning Viet Nam veterans. In December 1969, Seiko sold the first quartz watch, followed within months by a consortium of Swiss companies. These had traditional hands. The Seiko was very close to a modern design, using a stepper motor and a second hand that jumped in 1 second intervals. The Swiss used a variation of the Accutron tuning fork with its gliding hand. 1972 brought us Hamilton's Pulsar brand, the first digital. This watch was an LED design, requiring the user to push a button to read, initially costing $1200. Shortly after, Gruen launched the Teletime, the first modern LCD at around $200. In 1975, Texas Instruments began selling an LED watch for $20, and this price dropped to $10 a year later. Hamilton wound up bankrupt, and the Pulsar name was sold several times, eventually bought by Seiko, and used as a lower-cost analog brand. By the 80's, most watches sold in the US were quartz. Swiss watches suffered greatly, and most of the "everyday" brands were discontinued. A modern $10 quartz watch is more accurate than a $10,000 Swiss watch.
Bruce Schneier has another good article on security and terror--He says that security is a sort of tax. Like Doolittle's raid on Tokyo, the direct effects of 9-11 were not as significant as America's reaction to it. Many of the changes to our laws (The Patriot act, TSA's airport security rules, Real ID, photography as a suspicious activity) make our society much less free, and bring it closer to the society of our enemies. So what do we do about it? There is no easy solution, but a good start is to require outside auditing of public security measures, to determine both effectiveness and value. By value, I mean not just money, but also time and rights? Is it worthwhile to spend 150 man-years to save one life? The TSA shouldn't be deciding if the TSA's policies are effective. Some of these audits should be made by someone with experience in that field, but outside the government.
Friday, May 02, 2008
Thursday, May 01, 2008
I've updated to the latest stable version of Ubuntu, Hardy Heron. Not a whole lot of change that I can see. Firefox is updated to 3 beta 5. I'd already tried it--On my work laptop it worked fine, but here it gave fits with Google Reader, which was a dealbreaker. I looked again for a fix--Turns out to be maybe the simplest fix ever--Type CTRL-O. (Apparently on some machines where you've played with font sizes, something goofs reader up) The other thing that irritated me was that it deleted XMMS, the Linux version of Winamp, without suggesting an alternative with a similar GUI. I've been using the Winamp GUI for long enough that a competing player would have to be really compelling for me to make the switch. After a bit of research, I found that Audacious has a similar interface. Not sure if it is as stable, I've had a couple of GUI glitches in the little bit I've used it. The login has a glitch where the username and password are 10 times normal size (in a normal sized window)--This is similar to a glitch I had the first time I tried Compiz (does nifty but ultimately useless things with windows), except this time limited to the login dialog. I think I know about how to fix it--Add a line back to the xorg config file, but I'm too lazy and it isn't annoying enough to worry about looking up the exact details. Suspend still doesn't work right--It did a few versions ago, but the update 6 months ago broke it, this update didn't fix it. My laptop will suspend, but won't wake up without a hard power reset.